<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Thoughtpick - Latest Comments in Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://thoughtpickblog.disqus.com/</link><description>The Learn Social Media by Example e-Magazine</description><atom:link href="https://thoughtpickblog.disqus.com/is_twitter_abandoning_their_140_characters_limit/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:33:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-17068970</link><description>&lt;p&gt;weird, just had this happen to me for the first time today. I'm way behind the ball on this one.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tjanderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:33:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-11055625</link><description>&lt;p&gt;twitter won't abandon the 140 char that they're renowned for - &lt;a href="http://www.jumbotweet.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.jumbotweet.com"&gt;http://www.jumbotweet.com&lt;/a&gt; is a nice service to post longer twitter messages though that I've started using recently&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Linda</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:41:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-10267320</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the 140 limit and really hope they never change it, as it makes people get to the point of what they want to say (short &amp;amp; sweet).  Given too much space they want  to SPAM or rave on  and  that is the Bullshit we can do without.&lt;br&gt;          A great point made with your post here  Amer........TY   :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Allen  Sentance&lt;br&gt;Fisherman&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fi5herman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:30:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-10265777</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like the Twitter  140  platform as you can quickly read &amp;amp; converse . It will ruin  it's effectiveness if folks are given latitude with their messaging.  140  makes folks get to the point...............this is what all busy internet users look for and want.!!&lt;br&gt;      A great post Amer, I enjoy your input.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hey.....life is good.......&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Allen  Sentance&lt;br&gt;Fisherman&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fi5herman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:00:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9936420</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I like 140 characters as well - it really makes me think about what I need to say.  But a 160 characters would be great for those of us who just need to fit in that last bit of info=:)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Theresa McGee</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:21:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9935863</link><description>&lt;p&gt;140 limit is the genius of Twitter. I hope that doesn't change. &lt;br&gt;Thank you for explaining this little glitch I noticed recently. I can submit on Tweetdeck even if it's over 140, and it then creates the ellipsis. I can't do that on Twitter. But I can only click on the ... link on Twitter. So, definitely an unintended consequence of using two different platforms in combination.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Val Nelson HSP/Introvert Coach</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 16:45:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9929990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm at odds, not sure what to think.  So many times I've had to re-write because I had too many characters, but at the same time, I like the idea of getting right to the point.  Let's keep it the way it is.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mynameismud</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 11:33:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9876794</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's not new - it's just well hidden ;) Matrix indeed. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rosshill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 02:16:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9872895</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This has been possible for a long time now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Diego</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 23:49:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9860784</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@XLTweet I agree that it's a 'workaround hack'. It's intentionally built in, but obviously not encouraged by Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I checked TwitWall but didn't get its importance. Can't I do the same on a much larger and customizable scale with a regular blog? Also, to encourage people like me to register, install OAuth - no passwords given out!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for commenting. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amer K</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 16:13:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9859213</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Amer, this workaround hack has been going around for awhile now.... and I do emphasize its just a 'workaround hack' which Twitter may fix or patch at anytime. Thanks for the mention above. Feel free to stop by &lt;a href="http://XLTweet.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="XLTweet.com"&gt;XLTweet.com&lt;/a&gt; and the popular Twitter-ized blog &lt;a href="http://TwitWall.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="TwitWall.com"&gt;TwitWall.com&lt;/a&gt; anytime... we'll be glad you did.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eXtra Long Tweet</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 14:05:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9858602</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are correct. I just tried disabling Javascript in my Firefox, and it worked, I enabled it and it stopped!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amer K</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 13:20:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9858144</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a Javascript issue. You get up to 250 characters in some cases: &lt;a href="http://www.seoconsultants.com/twitter/supertweet/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.seoconsultants.com/twitter/supertweet/"&gt;http://www.seoconsultants.c...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 12:44:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9852530</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm starting to lean towards a bug, I think it's something to do with the Javascript validation they have on the posting input box.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;DB and server wise, I don't think it would do a big difference, I think bandwidth wise they'd be looking at a spike (I mean 140 to 248 chars is a 77% increase), and their main product is text!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amer K</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 07:34:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9852294</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am not quite sure when and how it happens, I just know that I got the message "your message is too long, but don't worry, blah, blah,blah" and then the ... &lt;br&gt;Will check how and when it works.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roland Hesz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 07:03:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9851335</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Roland, does it work for some people and not for others? It never worked for me!! Maybe there are some special cases?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 06:38:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9849684</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter has worked like this since last year, and by that I mean February at least. If you wrote over 140 characters - I sometimes did - the 3 dots appeared and people could click on it to see the whole text.&lt;br&gt;It usually worked in twhirl, tweetdeck and other 3rd party apps.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roland Hesz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 04:31:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9849202</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I tried it on both Firefox and IE, it didn't work!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree with @AdamPieniazek, the 140 limit is part of Twitter's brand, if you take it out, then we don't have a Twitter. It is one of Twitter's fundamental characteristic, I really hope that you have just caught a bug :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Was it just one tweet that worked with you this way? have you tried it several times? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FadiPick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 03:31:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9848974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Umm...wtf? I hope you just stumbled upon some bug/glitch and they're not changing the 140 character limit. Even if they keep the 140 limit in the twitter stream and have an ellipsis link out to the full tweet it's highly annoying not seeing the full message within my stream.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The 140 limit is part of Twitter's brand and one of the main advantages of it to blogging/other communication/social services. You can't just keep ranting and ranting on Twitter and have to get to your point. Without that limit the service fails.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And what effect would this have on their servers/databases which are already struggling?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AdamPieniazek</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 02:56:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9848028</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amer! I salute you for the attention to the tiniest details! Great post!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I agree... Twitter and 140 are meant to be :P&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beiruta</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 01:20:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9844859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm.. I am not sure. On my Firefox browser, I am able to write as much as I wish.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree with you, I think Twitter and 140 characters should never be separated.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amer K</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 21:37:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter Abandoning Their 140-characters limit?</title><link>http://blog.thoughtpick.com/2009/05/is-twitter-abandoning-their-140-characters-limit.html#comment-9844815</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I tried posting a long tweet but the post button grayed out after 140 characters. The 140 character limit is part of what makes Twitter what it is so I hope they don't abandon this. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jay | kpfingaz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 21:33:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>